After an initial period of heavy autumn rains the cookie was invaded by fine sand contained in the same rain, dry leaves from neighboring trees, etc. ...
We apologize for the dirt that you have found and that probably has created discomfort from both a technical and prestige of the park!
we meet as soon as possible to clean the facilities as was done in the past.
Thnks
Greenpeace Greenpeace presented a study born with ' ; aims to find green electronic products on the market already in 2007.
A year after its initial publication dell'Ecoguida electronic products, all companies have achieved a score of at least 5, half of which have even received a score between 7 and 8.
The votes were allocated on the basis of commitments stated: they are false or actually there is a growing commitment to greener practices?
This new report examined whether the promises of the companies are translated into reality.
were analyzed 37 products of 14 companies compared to four criteria: content of toxic chemicals, energy efficiency, use of the product cycle life of the product innovation and marketing.
The total maximum score of 100 points was assignable, then reported on a scale of 1 to 10.
The survey did not designate a winner. No single product has passed the 5, some have had good scores on some aspects but not in others. Consequently no product excels when measured over all the environmental criteria of reference.
Three products scored just over 5 and therefore differ from the other, reaching half way up the path Greenpeace: Sony Vaio TZ11 (notebook), Sony Ericsson T650 (mobile), Sony Ericsson P1i (PDA). The
Sony Ericsson P1i smartphone is square with 5.10 points in the first place because the criteria for chemicals (minor exemptions to the RoHS directive, no PVC, phthalates and beryllium) as well as the absence of brominated flame retardants tab main.
with 3.95 points in second place is located on your handheld Hewlett-Packard iPAQ 510 thanks to the efficiency of its adapter.
convert this post pdf to. 
The challenge is this: global environmental develop an intelligence capable of making us continue in our evolution towards a society capable of living without necessarily continue to weigh heavily on the nature and vulnerable populations, without necessarily poison the air we breathe, without necessarily end up in the water that holds all of life, human or otherwise, without necessarily melt all the ice there is, at least, what little is left.
What has described himself as "Homo-Sapiens-Sapiens" because of its unique way of thinking, this challenge unique (because crucial for the preservation of life as we know it and so imminent) responded in various ways, mostly ridiculous (in my opinion), certainly worthy of a being who is always too compared to God
In essence, rather than slightly modify our current lifestyle, the most prominent minds on the planet are made to think the best way to "deceive Nature" with two or three costossimi subterfuge. As he writes, "Republic": " failing will to fight the cause, at least you try to attack the effects . Unfortunately
who has the task to think of a "solution" seems unable to afford to go further by also think about the possible consequences thereof. Action -> Reaction.
I did not understand why, but "on the upper floors," seems to work well ...
CASE 1: Sprinkle sulfur land
the stratosphere with the continuous casting of "mega-aerosol" .
operation cost $ 100,000,000 per year
The idea is Nobel laureate Paul Crutzen
or better ... the aforementioned Nobel Prize for his idea was inspired by the eruption of a huge volcano (the Pinatubo in the Philippines) in the early '90s erupted violently in the air, leaving an intense cloud of sulfur (intense, calculated at about 20 megatons of sulfur gas), which lasted for several months in the atmosphere, cooling the climate of the globe for a couple of years. Simple: the micro-sulfur left "soaking" in the atmosphere acted as a mirror reflecting the sunlight could not reach the ground.
Too bad if you were take this absurd way, it would without a doubt a decision one way.
Paul Crutzen has not thought about the consequences, fortunately they did more for him and the consequences of his brilliant idea not to be rosy.
Ken Caldeira, a leading climatologist at Stanford simulated peak the process of release of sulfur into the stratosphere, with the next-likely responses of the Earth:
as already demonstrated by the volcano, actually a fall in global temperature is possible. Too bad, that stopping to enter the gas ammorbante , the earth's temperature would suddenly leap up and the whole process of overheating overall would be much faster than it is today, the drought and water shortages would make the rest, killing hundreds of millions of people around the world.
also estimated that the sulfur thin in a short time the entire earth's ozone layer ... you evaluated.
CASE 2: Disseminate the oceans of the iron dust in order to grow phytoplankton * able to absorb CO2. .
* (a set of algae is very important because it generates half the total oxygen produced by plant organisms of the Earth-Wikipedia-).
pity that the iron will damage the marine ecosystem in a short time, already quite fragile, because of us always.
The authorship of this brilliant contest is between two "giants" of the American climate, and the Climos Planktos, which has long boasted of throwing iron powder here and there for the oceans.
try to solve a problem by creating another,
someone can tell them? ...
CASE 3: Withdraw all the carbon dioxide
with so many "super suction". Simple as evil.
vacuum cleaners in question are produced by the latest U.S. giant ( Global Research Technologies), each of them has the size of a truck and to pick up 10 million tonnes (t ) of CO2 per year (1 / 3 of the current annual emissions) there vorrebero 30 million parked here and there around the globe. The aspratoroni are able, through chemical reactions to convert carbon dioxide into an unnamed "inert" but should be carefully buried in remote areas ...
operation cost $ 250,000 / t
Co2 ( 250 thousand 30milioni x = $ 7,500,000,000 per year - settemiliardicinquecentomilioni dollars a year).
Azz!
It would be a really good deal for the Global Research Technologies ...
These assumptions (only some are) a little 'smile and do a little' make skin crawl. It may sound a bit 'less whether they come from all geoengineering projects (engineering of the earth or "revolutionary approach to climate change") adopted by many American companies, to avoid giving up vices are habits-preg-sell' s soul to the devil, if you have not already done ... A
for the Exxon-Mobil, which was discovered in the past to pay for these decerebration and inept researchers write that the " Global Warning" is an invention.
convert this post to pdf. 
